SARS-Cov-2 Laboratory Origins
Entire books have already been written around the origins of SARS-Cov-2, the virus that can cause the disease Covid-19 (https://drasticresearch.org/books/). In the beginning of the pandemic, as shown by emails obtained by FOIA, there was an internal (non-public) acknowledgment by Fauci, the NIH, and the CDC that the origins were likely a lab leak. Then quickly, many secret meetings were called, and all of the sudden, the “wet market” theory for the origins was the only acceptable narrative. Any effort to research the actual origins was completely shut down as a “conspiracy theory” and anyone on social media who had a different opinion was censored and even suspended, sometimes permanently. In the meantime, China took down most of its research databases that were previously open to the public relating to the Wuhan Institute of Virology research were related to adenoviruses like SARS-Cov-2.
A summary of the events around the origins:
· The SARS-Cov-2 virus is a product of “gain-of-function” research being performed in China at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It was based on research that began at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, but was moved to China after concerns that research of that type violated US law.
· Gain-of-function = viruses genetically modified in a laboratory to be biological weapons. Weapons as viruses start out as viruses found in nature, but are engineered to be more dangerous (more deadly or more transmissible) to either humans or animals.
· SARS-Cov-2 did not originate at a Chinese wet (live animal) market. No evidence of SARS-Cov-2 was ever found in any of the animals of any species at the wet market nor were any of the market vendors affected in the early stages.
· Geo-maps of the first cases that seem to indicate the wet market as the center of origin were later analyzed and found to have been manipulated. In looking at more detailed geo-mapping, the points of origin for the virus were residential neighborhoods close to the Wuhan Institute of Virology where many employees of the institute likely lived. The wet market happened to be in those neighborhoods.
· Many US government officials and contractors have gone to great lengths to obfuscate the origins of SARS-Cov-2, including Anthony Fauci, because the “gain-of-function” research (illegal in the US because GOF = weaponizing viruses) was done in China, but funded by the US govt. This cover-up is documented by numerous emails obtained through the FOIA.
DRASTIC – A Grass Roots Investigation Group
Because governments were not basing their claims on actual data and science from the beginning, within a short time (late winter of 2020), the DRASTIC organization assembled itself. DRASTIC is an unofficial collection of people in the field of virology, genetics and other types of science and research who were determined to get to the bottom of the origins. They have a website, and though technical in nature, goes about proving the lab-origin hypothesis. Their website links to many books written about the investigation to the origins:
https://drasticresearch.org/
A substack (independent author publication site) from one of the DRASTIC team chronicling their research is here:
Article from one of the DRASTIC team, “Gaslight of the Gods, part VII: Allegory of the Plague” or “We don’t have to find the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to find the origin of the pandemic”:
Dr. Fauci and a few other senior scientists knew instantly that the discovery of HIV spike inserts within the SAR-CoV-2 viral genome made it almost impossible for the virus to be natural.
Scientific Proof that the SARS-Cov-2 Virus was created in a lab
The tool used to compare and contrast genetic samples from all over the world is called BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). In the following article, the author uses BLAST tool which is a tool used internationally to find DNA segments within a larger DNA sample. Think of the BLAST tool as being similar to the FBI’s AFIS tool, used to match fingerprints found at a crime scene to fingerprints in the FBI database.
If you’re not a geneticist, this is a difficult article to follow in detail. But if you skim it and take note of the highlights, you can see how the author walks through the proof that SARS-Cov-2 must have come from a laboratory. Bottom line is that there are segments of the SARS-Cov-2 virus that are patented. Only man-made DNA segments can be patented, so finding a patented DNA segment in the SARS-Cov-2 virus sequence means that SARS-Cov-2 had to have been engineered. In the case of SARS-Cov-2, the DNA segment in question was patented by Moderna in 2017.
NIH Cover-up of Origins
Just recently, the NIH (National Institute of Health) has admitted that Fauci knowingly lied about the origins of Covid.
Besides the fact that there are clearly engineered DNA segments in the SARS-CoV-2 virus DNA, there are also far, far too many changes in the virus from the virus found in nature to have occurred naturally without us noticing the intermediary steps. In addition, the presence of several HIV inserts is basically a “smoking gun”. Excellent interview with Dr. Peter Fleming on the origins of Covid-19, with additional commentary on the vaccine (also, he is the author of the book, written for the general public: Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?: A Scientific and Forensic investigation):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/L8FK3xKF4zJ3/
https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Bioweapon-Scientific-Forensic-investigation-ebook/dp/B0977KNFSY
Here is a video of the Hudson Institute panel discussion and their investigation into the COVID-19 origins. A case for criminal investigation starts at around 6:20:
There was a brief hearing held by the US Senate Homeland Security Committee on gain-of-function research, held on August 3, 2022:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/08/03/4-takeaways-from-senate-panels-hearing-on-gain-of-function-research-covid-19/
Next article: Part 1.2, The Use of Fear, Isolation and Censorship in Western Countries to Assert Totalitarian Policies