PART 2.2 - The WHO (World Health Organization), Gavi, and the UN
Global and Political Issues Associated with the Pandemic
The WHO (World Health Organization) & Gavi
Nearly 200 countries are member of the WHO, and signatories to the IHR (International Health Regulations) which is a set of regulations drawn up and coordinated by the WHO. Those IHR regulations is how those nearly 200 countries all adopt the same language, the same tactics and the same approach to the pandemic. Although we automatically give the WHO the benefit of the doubt that its intents are honorable, should we continue to do so considering that just their lockdown policies alone caused millions of deaths, possibly more deaths overall than deaths solely due to Covid-19? It also caused the closure of millions of small businesses based on the theory that small stores were “dangerous” to humanity – but Costco, Walmart and Home Depot were not?
The real eye-opener is that the WHO was completely against an economic lockdown right up until 2020 because it was always understood how damaging that could be to populations and economies. In fact, the policy only changed when Bill Gates “took over” the WHO, the same time he abolished the ethics division within the WHO.
https://greatgameindia.com/who-whistleblower-astrid-stuckelberger-bill-gates/
Incidentally, Bill Gates is the primary funder of the WHO (over $1B per year – substantially more than the US government) and fully controls their policies and actions per WHO whistleblowers who saw fundamental change for the worse in policy and ethics after he took over about ten years ago.
Gates’ other primary organization which he enforces his will upon the globe is called Gavi. Gavi is an NGO (non-Governmental Organization) that advocates for vaccines as the global solution for healthcare. Gavi is set up in Switzerland as its own sovereign entity, as if it were its own country, with Bill installed as its chief diplomat, complete with diplomatic immune to Swiss laws.
One major news story that escaped the mainstream media is that the WHO in May, 2022, tried to ram through a revised set of International Health Regulations that would give them dictatorial powers over sovereign nations. Fortunately, the African nations which have already been burned by their vaccine policies refused to ratify the new additions, and we narrowly avoided a dictatorship by the WHO.
The Globalists version: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/africa-objects-us-push-reform-health-rules-who-assembly-2022-05-24/
The free person’s version: https://www.australiannationalreview.com/health/good-news-who-pandemic-treaty-voted-down/
WHO policy influence by Gates
The WHO is the primary influence over the global issue of pandemics. Many nation states have agreed to abide by the IHR – International Health Regulations which determine a
A number of former WHO employees have come forward to state for the record that the WHO, up until 2020, was strongly against lockdowns and masks, and the concept of “social distancing” for a virus wasn’t even a concept that was considered. The observation from whistleblowers changed considerably after Bill Gates bought his way into imposing his will on the WHO about ten years ago. One of the first things he did was to disband the ethics committee, and he has had increasingly dictatorial influence over the WHO ever since.
https://rumble.com/vo8ehd-astrid-stuckelberger-who-corruption-planet-lockdown.html
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
The United Nations (UN)
Once thought of as an organization for “world peace”, anyone who follows NATO actions around the globe know that the UN is not an organization for peace, but an organization that uses deception to gather power.
If you hear reference to the UN 2030, it’s a plan that is supposed to transform the world using “sustainable development”.
“The World Economic Forum and the United Nations signed today a Strategic Partnership Framework outlining areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
Both organizations openly say they intend to use their considerable wealth and power in combination to control world finance, approaches to climate change, human health, technology and the “empowerment” of women. For that last part, their obsession on pushing transgender issues is having the opposite effect, of course. Most women feel less safe and less empowered, which is the intent:
https://www.westernjournal.com/80-year-old-woman-banned-ymca-pool-saw-man-womens-dressing-room/
Unfortunately, we are just in the beginning stages, but yet already we can see that the words don’t match the actions. Another example is forcibly moving indigenous tribes off of their ancestral land, like what is happening to the Maasai right now under the auspices of “sustainability”. The land will be taken from the Maasai and given to colonialist developers to turn their land into high-end game preserves.
The UN’s website:
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
It all sounds great until you realize that the only way to achieve these goals is to dominate and control every free human on the planet. The planet becomes a prison where people are kept in slave quarters, with slave rations, without even a family, self-determination, creativity or freedom, whose only purpose is to serve a brutal capitalistic machine where every person is a highly-controlled product, not a human being. The exception is the elite, who will live their lives lawlessly, unfettered of responsibility or accountability,
The details of the realities of some of the UN 2030 plan are discussed here:
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/un-world-economic-forum-behind-global-war-on-farmers/
Un-ironically - once you realize that the UN is not what they say they are - the UN is openly behind creating world hunger in order to control the populace. This article caused such a backlash, it was taken down within a day of being posted, but clearly it aligns with the UN’s ultimate goals.
If you’re unaware about the history of the Director-General of the UN, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, his history is that of an international thug and criminal. Also, he isn’t a medical doctor; he has a PhD in Philosophy:
Next article: Part 2.3, Digital ID, Social Credit, the WEF (World Economic Forum) and CBDC (Central Bank Digital Credit) - and the corruption that holds it all together