The Speech
Klaus Schwab to national politicians justifying depopulation - or just a clever and very creepy fake?
I heard Dr. Mike Yeadon speak for the first time in the summer of 2021. At the same time I was impressed with his bravery, I was shocked that he would suggest that, based on his experience as a former pharma VP, we were in the middle of a mass depopulation plan. Though what he said shook me to my core, it also rang true. One of Dr. Mike Yeadon’s first videos:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qRM53leSNftt/
I did a keyword search on Twitter on “depopulation” to see who, if anything, was also talking about it. There were very few mentions at that time, but I found an account that seemed to be a snarky kid who finds weird stuff from 4chan and then cross-posts it to Twitter. They made a post of a screenshot of a series of 4chan posts making fun of the “anons” and their depopulation plan. For those who don’t know, 4chan is an old-style message board site where the users are all anonymous and anything goes. It’s often used to make posts where there’s no traceability back to the account user.
Anything posted to 4chan, then, could be anything, from anyone. But what grabbed me was the detail. First, there is a long-winded and insincere apologia, using climate change as the justification for depopulation. Then the post goes through all the tactics for how the plan would unfold. What's really chilling is that there are several details from 2021 that were not on the radar then - that are really obvious two years later.
I did a search using the 4chan text on several different search engines and found nothing at all. I then direct-messaged someone on Twitter who's an international expert in propaganda and asked if he would look at the post. He was gracious enough to say yes, and after a day or two, he came back with his assessment. He said he had never seen anything like it before, but because of the content, and what he knew about the plan, he thought it could be authentic.
Since then, I’ve shown it to a few other people - warning them first as I have no desire to frighten people who aren’t ready. The response is usually either “yeah, it confirms what I already know” - or silence. Sometimes people reject it outright, but don’t have anything specific to point to, they just refuse to believe something that was truly authentic could make it to 4chan. A few have pointed out that there are some typos, spelling errors, missing punctuation and grammatical errors that contrasts too sharply with the haughty, over-educated speech. My explanation for that is that someone in the audience - who wasn’t part of the target audience, a waiter or bartender, perhaps - recorded and transcribed the text from a speech, hence the errors.
To reduce the distraction of the errors and discontinuity of 4chan posts, see edited text below. The original text with message headers and time stamp, from an archive of that 4chan series of posts, is here: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/330702296
De-population Agenda 101
In order to preserve the earth's life sustaining ability in the face of unbridled population growth, excess resource consumption over renewable ability and global climate and atmospheric affects we are faced with an unpleasant reality. We may continue down our current path to which the entire planet will become doomed resulting in cascading biosphere collapses, human unrest, anarchy and chaos.
Our alternative is to carry the burden of our unpleasant reality and make very hard decisions to reduce our population in order to sustain the long term habitability of our planet and maintain its unique biodiversity and natural resources.
In execution of this burden, in order to ease the transition into a new world order for the long term survivability of humanity we must have a multifaceted and controlled reduction in production and private land ownership while ensuring the tools and resources necessary to have maximized automated production capabilities by ensuring an adequate stockpile of microprocessor units and related natural resources for machinery production.
In order to execute the de-population agenda without causing undue reaction or retaliation from the population thereby preserving a level of peace and control and avoiding the undesirable outcome of violence and destruction a gradual process must be enacted whereby the populace will not become aware of the harsh reality of the situation until any major ability for retaliation is mitigated to a level of near non-existence.
It is in this way that we will achieve those goals of earth's preservation and long-term habitability.
To use modern gene editing technology to create a rapidly spreading virus which may be variably controlled in effect to increase and decrease severity of symptomatic development.
As viruses mutate rapidly and are rather uncontrollable by nature this shall not be the major vector of de-population.
Simultaneously a vaccine which may be better controlled to the effects of its traits shall be produced. Through the action and our understanding of vaccine enhanced disease in the long researched relation to coronaviruses we feel that this is the ideal candidate whereby the immune response of individuals becomes dependent upon vaccinations while also becoming more vulnerable to future iterations of the virus.
Working together in a global dynamic environment will be paramount and it is well-understood amongst member nations that this is an unpleasant but necessary action in order to preserve both peace and prosperity to the long term and benefit of all humanity.
Whereby our understanding of spike protein interaction within the human body and its gradual and long term effects we feel this is the most humane method to enact a graduated level of de-population across time to minimize undesirable human caused destruction of the environment by causing low levels of alarms and avoiding panic that would occur through more rapid methods.
From the initial viral spread a global vaccination program may be instituted to catalog and record members ensuring a willing population which will thereby through the action of virus enhanced disease become dependent on continued vaccinations for survival.
Through controlling interim batches and the understood side effects reproductive processes can be controlled as well as a major but gradual reduction in overall population over the course of 3-5 years.
If at such a time it becomes necessary through lack of willing vaccination members to adequately reduce population to sustainable levels, more severe versions of the virus may be then released which will appear as naturally-occurring. The action will increase vaccination compliance particularly among the unwilling nation states.
In order to reduce negative or unpredictable viral jumps to our food supplies and mitigate unforeseen consequences from a virus created thusly, genetic adjuncts from another species should be added where it is known that the genomic sequence is highly susceptible to neutralization making the viral load ineffective in the presence of specific medications to safely neutralize the disease through readily available treatment specifically available to our livestock resources.
To me, the most prescient section of the post is the part of the plan where it is stated it will take 3 to 5 years to show a noticeable effect and start to reduce the population. Could this be the globalists’ biggest mistake, that they gravely miscalculated what dosage would deliver them that 3 to 5 year plan?
We know that Pfizer was under tremendous pressure to make certain dates to deliver the shots, and we know that they likely committed fraud to do so. (See Brook Jackson’s site with details on her lawsuit accusing Pfizer of fraud during the trials: https://www.iambrookjackson.com/ ) In their rush to get at the most lucrative deal in the history of pharma deals, did they miss that there were certain guardrails of toxicity that they failed to observe, thereby releasing a product that was far more toxic out of the gate than intended?
We almost certainly know that Pfizer’s initial batches came out of the gate far too “hot” and then over time were stair-stepped down in toxicity by lot number which increases by date; from howbadismybatch.com/:
The same effect is seen in Moderna batches:
Clearly, the deaths from the shots started immediately after the rollouts, not 3 to 5 years later. Yet per their plan, the earliest the deaths should be occurring is still in the future, the end of 2023, and yet the deaths and injuries due to the shots are worsening. Although both Pfizer and Moderna tried to reduce the toxicity of the batches that first year, the deadliest shots had already been delivered into millions of arms and it was too late to take it back.
If the globalists did make the biggest mistake of the entire plan by unintentionally accelerating their schedule by several years, perhaps that gives us a window to where the deaths, injuries and disabilities are too many and too noticeable to force a critical mass of people to wake up.